In a startling revelation, a self-proclaimed “vaccine scientist-author-combat anti-science professor” has been revealed as a fraud and a puppet for Big Pharma and the infamous Bill Gates. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the scientific community and ignited a fierce debate on social media.
What makes this situation even more ironic is that the very cultural camp that has been advocating for global censorship, stringent COVID policies, and mandates like mask-wearing and compulsory vaccinations, is now accusing their opponents of having “neo-fascist leanings” or being “neo-fascists” themselves.
The controversy began when the aforementioned scientist, Prof. Peter Hotez, resorted to name-calling, labeling notable figures such as democrat presidential contender Robert F. Kennedy, popular podcast host Joe Rogan, and billionaire Elon Musk as “neo-fascists.” This triggered a global Twitter debate, with Joe Rogan challenging Hotez to a debate with Kennedy instead of engaging in childish insults and name-calling.
However, Hotez dismissed Rogan’s challenge, continuing his derogatory remarks and even accusing his critics and those who disagreed with him of spreading “vaccine disinformation.” When pressed once again to debate Kennedy, Hotez responded with a seemingly nonchalant tweet, saying “Joe, you have my cell, my email, I’m always willing to speak with you.”
Rogan, determined to make the debate happen, called out Hotez for avoiding the challenge, stating that his response was a “non-answer.” Rogan emphasized that the debate could reach an unprecedented audience, giving Hotez an opportunity to defend his beliefs. Rogan even suggested that if Hotez believed someone else was better qualified, he should recommend that person.
It didn’t take long for this trending issue on Twitter to catch the attention of prominent personalities on the platform. Some of them went as far as offering hundreds of thousands of dollars to Hotez’s charity of choice, hoping to entice him into accepting the debate challenge.
However, billionaire Mark Cuban, known for his support of Democrats, came to Hotez’s defense, claiming he was being bullied. Cuban argued that Hotez would have control over the conversation on Rogan’s show.
This prompted millionaire podcaster Patrick Bet-David to mock Cuban’s defense and highlight the widespread coercion and pressure people faced to take the vaccine. Bet-David cited forced vaccinations, job threats, business closures, and even the inconsistent messaging from health officials as examples of the bullying tactics employed.
“Millions of Americans from all walks of life were bullied into taking the vaccine. Some forced. Many coerced. Many threatened to lose their jobs. Thousands of businesses went bankrupt.
Families were divided on the vaccine issue. Late night hosts doing skits dressed in a syringes Mayors of NY city offering free fries if you took the vaccine NIH director flip flopping on masks.” Bet-David tweeted.
As tensions escalated, Dr. Simon Goddek, a biotechnology PhD holder known for exposing individuals like Dr. Anthony Fauci, took to Twitter to expose Hotez.
In a scathing thread, Goddek sarcastically referred to Hotez as a sincere and incorruptible scientist who had been right about everything in the last three years.
However, he then accused Hotez of spreading misinformation and causing harm, particularly by advocating for the vaccination of children to achieve herd immunity.
Goddek further pointed out the hypocrisy of Hotez’s stance, highlighting his previous concerns about a potential vaccine for the seasonal cold virus. He questioned how Hotez had suddenly changed his opinion and resorted to labeling all critics as anti-science. Goddek suggested that Hotez’s ties to the Gates Foundation, among other financial contributions, might explain his behavior.
Moreover, the dangerous aspect of Hotez lies in his use of language and his demonization of those who hold different opinions. He has not hesitated to label critical thinkers as anti-science or even anti-Semitic, going so far as to demand treating them like terrorists. Hotez has called for the creation of a task force to combat “anti-science” individuals, comparing the situation to global terrorism.
These explosive revelations have left many questioning Hotez’s credibility and integrity. It seems he is more interested in monetary gains and manipulating public opinion than engaging in a fair and open debate. The scientific community and concerned citizens alike are now left to ponder the impact of such deception and the need for honest discourse in these challenging times.
The Daily Netizen 