Maharlika Boldyakera’s Latest Allegations: DOT Sec Frasco’s Alleged P120 Million House

Pro-Duterte vlogger Maharlika Boldyakera has recently dropped bombshell allegations surrounding the extravagant properties owned by several high-ranking government officials.

Her video, titled “120 Million Pesos na Bahay ni DOT Frasco,” amassed over 7,500 views within just two hours, raising eyebrows and sparking heated discussions in political circles.

Maharlika began her scathing critique by targeting Department of Tourism Secretary Christina Frasco, accusing her of falsehoods and questioning her credibility. In an impassioned tone, she exclaimed, “Frasco, nuknukan ka ng kasinungalingan. Kagalang-galang ba ‘to? Honorable pa tong mga jutang ina na mga to na walang ginawa kundi ipanapahiya ang ating bayan.”

Maharlika also questioned Frasco’s mother, Cebu Governor Gwendolyn Garcia, stating, “Akala ko magaling ang nanay niya diyan sa Cebu. Akala ko magaling yang nanay niña. Sila diyan sa Cebu.”

The vlogger continued her tirade, touching upon other personalities involved in the alleged property acquisitions. She claimed that the chief of staff for Sandro Marcos, Yeye Vivas, formerly a yaya (nanny), had built a multimillion-peso house. However, Maharlika did not provide concrete evidence to confirm Vivas’s role as Sandro Marcos’s chief of staff.

The revelations didn’t stop there. Maharlika alleged that presidential adviser on Creative Communications and the first lady’s nephew, Paul Soriano, had also erected a lavish house in McKinley Hills Village. She further claimed that the chief of staff for House Speaker Martin Romualdez was also building a luxurious residence. These accusations painted a picture of opulent lifestyles among government officials, leaving viewers stunned and curious about the extent of these claims.

As the list of individuals grew, so did the alleged worth of their properties. According to Maharlika, Anton Lagdameo, Special Assistant to the President and a key contributor to Bongbong Marcos’s 2020 presidential campaign, supposedly purchased a property worth more than a billion pesos in Forbes Park. However, without concrete evidence, the authenticity of this allegation remains uncertain.

The vlogger also implicated the First Couple, Bongbong Marcos and Liza Araneta-Marcos, suggesting that they had acquired properties in Iloilo and San Fernando, La Union. However, these claims require further investigation and verification to establish their accuracy.

With regard to Frasco’s alleged P120 million property in Cebu, Maharlika stated: “So lahat sila nag-build build ng house kayo lubog ang Pilipinas. Ayon sa ating Puting Ahas sa sina na malapit kina Frasco, kaya siguro hindi pa umaalis yan o mag-resign ay sahil sa kanyang multi-million na nabiling bahay sa Maria Luisa Estate Park na mala-Forbes Park daw yan ng Cebu. At ang presyohan sa mga bahay diyan ay nagre-range ng 80 million pataas. Saan galing yong pera? Is that in one year?”

Despite the sensational nature of the allegations, it is important to approach the information with caution. Maharlika did not provide concrete evidence to substantiate her claims, stating that her information came from unnamed sources. To validate the authenticity and truthfulness of her exposes, a thorough examination of the evidence provided by her sources is necessary.

It is worth noting that Maharlika has gained a reputation for exposing controversial issues in the past, some of which have proven to be true. Her association with politicians, particularly the Marcoses in the past, has raised questions about potential motivations behind her recent revelations. As this story develops, the veracity of the allegations will become clearer, shedding light on the truth behind the opulent properties supposedly owned by government officials.

The public eagerly awaits further evidence and confirmation to separate fact from fiction. In the world of politics, where power and wealth intertwine, the exposure of alleged improprieties serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in public service.

Advertisements

Leave a comment