The Sandiganbayan Fifth Division has finally delivered a verdict on Senator Jinggoy Estrada, finding him guilty of one count of direct bribery and two counts of indirect bribery in connection with the infamous pork barrel scam.

This conviction not only places his Senate position at risk but also imposes fines and a prison sentence.

While Estrada was acquitted of plunder related to the misuse of the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) or pork barrel fund, legal experts cautioned against an appeal, suggesting that his earlier acquittal on plunder charges could be challenged at the Supreme Court.

Senate President Juan Miguel Zubiri emphasized the Senate’s acknowledgment of the Sandiganbayan’s decision, stating, “The Senate also recognizes the fact that there are still remedies available to Sen. Jinggoy under existing laws and the Rules of Court.”

Zubiri pointed out that until the verdict becomes final and executory, Estrada is obligated to carry out his senatorial duties.

He outlined potential legal avenues, stating, “He can still file a Motion for Reconsideration with the Sandiganbayan; he can still file an appeal by certiorari with the Supreme Court.”

The Sandiganbayan acquitted Estrada of plunder but sentenced him to imprisonment, a P3 million fine, and “temporary absolute disqualification and perpetual special disqualification from the right to vote.”

Lawyer Alexis Abastillas Suarez clarified that the disqualification penalties would only take effect when the ruling becomes final.

Janet Napoles, often dubbed the “pork barrel queen,” also faced consequences, receiving a conviction on multiple counts of corruption and bribery.

She was sentenced to up to 62 years in prison and ordered to pay substantial fines and indemnify the government over P262 million.

The court justified the bribery convictions by stating that elements of direct and indirect bribery were necessarily included in plunder, drawing on a 2003 Supreme Court decision.

Senator Estrada, reacting to the verdict, pledged to pursue all legal remedies and appealed for public understanding.

In an interview, he expressed confusion over being acquitted of plunder but convicted of bribery and emphasized his exoneration from the main charge.

Speaking to reporters after his court sentencing, Estrada emphasized that the information sheet only focuses on the plunder case, of which he has already been acquitted and exonerated.

He stated, “I will ask my lawyers to exhaust all legal remedies, all legal options available for me. But I still believe in our justice system.”

Senator JV Ejercito, Estrada’s half-brother, extended well wishes amid the legal challenges. He urged respect for the court’s decision and emphasized the importance of upholding the justice system.

Despite the acquittal on plunder charges, questions remain about the evidence presented.

Former Senator Leila de Lima, who filed the plunder complaint in 2014, maintained that there was a strong case against Estrada. She expressed curiosity about the elements lacking in the court’s decision and suggested potential modifications if an appeal reaches the Supreme Court.